This begs the question that if so, why do we not base our best text of the Bible on other sources such as the Old Greek or a Qumran text in books such as Samuel. PDF | During the last few decades, the subject of the historical Jesus has once again moved into the center of scholarly studies among New. world experts on both the Scrolls and Jesus, died several days ago. Geza Vermes was a formidable scholar. Of the three major English translations of the Scrolls.
|Language:||English, Spanish, Dutch|
|Genre:||Academic & Education|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Register to download]|
The Complete Dead Sea Scrolls in English by Geza Vermes (PDF). DEAD SEA SCROLLS TEXTS. The Book of Giants. • 1Q23, 11 images. The Historical Jesus: The View of Professor Geza Vermes Louis C. de Figueiredo Professor Geza Vermes, one of the translators of the Dead Sea Scrolls and an. Winter Geza Vermes and the Third Quest for the Historical. Jesus: A Review Essay on 'Jesus in His Jewish. Context'. Gary R. Habermas. Liberty University.
You do not currently have access to this article. Download all figures. Sign in. You could not be signed in. Sign In Forgot password? Don't have an account? Sign in via your Institution Sign in. download Subscription prices and ordering Short-term Access To download short term access, please sign in to your Oxford Academic account above. This article is also available for rental through DeepDyve. View Metrics. Email alerts New issue alert. Advance article alerts. Article activity alert.
Receive exclusive offers and updates from Oxford Academic. Citing articles via Google Scholar. A Study in Johannine Ethics. By Cornelis Bennema. Jesus and the Eyewitnesses: The Gospels as Eyewitness Testimony. By Richard Bauckham. A Religio-Historical Analysis. Vetus Latina.
Die Reste der altlateinischen Bible. Evangelium secundum Marcum. Jesus, according to Professor Meier, 6 is an 'eschatological prophet' and a 'charismatic' similar to 'Elijah'. In other words, the 'mar- ginalJew' is the mirror im'. Thus unwittingly he vindicates my cynical remark published prior to the appearance of vol- ume II of A Marginal Jew To quote a couple of recent opinions, Paula Fredriksen, of Boston University, describes the Jesus trilogy as 'a groundbreaking series of studies on the historical Jesus' which 'have enjoyed great popularity'.
In one respect this search is surprising: namely that it has been under- 1,1kcn at all. In another, it is unusual: that it has been made without - so far as I am consciously aware - any ulterior motive. Let me develop these two points.
Even ifl lud chosen as my target the more trendy effort of yesterday, the 'repatria- tion of Jesus into the Jewish people' - Heimholung Jesu in das jiidische Volk it is unlikely to have led to an untendentiousenquiry, to an analysis of the.
My purpose, both in the written and the verbal examination of'Jesus the Jew', has been to look into the past for some trace of the features of the first-century Galilean, before he had been proclaimed either the second 2 Jesus in his Jewish Context Person of the Holy Trinity, or the apostate and bogey man of Jewish popular thought.
Strangely enough, because of the special nature of the Gospels, a large group of Christians, including such opposing factions as the out-and-out fundamentalists and the highly sophisticated New Testament critics, would consider a historical enquiry of this sort ipso facto doomed to failure.
Our knowledge of Jesus - they would claim - depends one hundred per cent on the New Testament: writings that were never intended as history but as a record of the faith of Jesus' first followers. The fundamentalists deduce from these premises that the pure truth embedded in the Gospels is accessible only to those who share the evangelists' outlook.
Those who do not do so are - to quote a letter published in the Guardian 2 - 'still in the night At the other extreme stands the leading spokesman of the weightiest contemporary school of New Testament scholarship, Rudolf Bultmann. Instead of asserting with the fundamentalists that no quest for the histori- cal Jesus should be attempted, Bultmann is firmly convinced that no such quest can be initiated.
Yet I will at the same time try to indicate that, despite wide- spread academic scepticism, our considerably increased knowledge of the Palestinian-Jewish realities of the time of Jesus enables us to extract historically reliable information even from non-historical sources such as the gospels. In fact, with the discovery and study of the Dead Sea Scrolls and other archaeological treasures, and the corresponding improvement in our understanding of the ideas, doctrines, methods of teaching, languages and culture of the Jews of New Testament times, it is now possible, not simply to place Jesus in relief against this setting, as students of the Jewish back- ground of Christianity pride themselves on doing, but to insert him fair and square within first-century Jewish life itself.
The questions then to be asked are where he fits into it, and whether the added substance and clarity gained from immersing him in historical reality confers credibility on the patchy Gospel picture. Let us begin then by selecting a few non-controversial facts concerning Jesus' life and activity, and endeavour to build on these foundations. Jesus the Jew 3 Jesus lived in Galilee, a province governed during his lifetime, not by the Romans, but by a son of Herod the Great.
His home-town was Nazareth, an insignificant place not referred to by Josephus, the Mishnah or the Talmud, and first mentioned outside the New Testament in an inscription from Caesarea, dating to the third or fourth century. Whether he was born there or somewhere else is uncertain. The Bethlehem legend is in any case highly suspect. As for the date of his birth, this 'is not truly a historical problem', writt:s one of the greatest living experts on antiquity, Sir Ronald Syme.
Nevertheless the general chronological context is clearly defined. Whether Jesus taught for one, two or three years, his execution in Jerusalem must have occurred in the early thirties of the first century. He was fairly young when he died. Luke reports that he was approxi- mately thirty years old when he joined John the Baptist Luke 3. Also one of the few points on which Matthew and Luke, the only two evangel- ists to elaborate on the events preceding and following Jesus' birth, agree is in dating them to the days of King Herod of Judaea Matt.
I ,et me try to sketch the world ofJesus' youth and early manhood in the second and third decades of the first century. In distant Rome, Tiberius reigned supreme. Valerius Gratus and Pontius Pilate were governing J udaea.
Joseph Caiaphas was high priest of the Jews, the president of the Jerusalem Sanhedrin, and the head of the Sadducees. Hillel and Shammai, the leaders of the most influential Pharisaic schools, were possibly still ;tlive, and during the life-time of Jesus, Gamaliel the Elder became Hillel's successor. Not far from Jerusalem, a few miles south of Jericho, on the shore of the Dead Sea, the ascetic Essenes were worshipping God in holy withdrawal and planning the conversion of the rest of Jewry to the true Judaism known only to them, the followers of the Teacher of Righteous- ness.
And in neighbouring Egypt, in Alexandria, the philosopher Philo was busy harmonizing the Jewish life-style with the wisdom of Greece, a dream cherished by the civilized Jews of the Diaspora. In Galilee, the tetrarch Herod Antipas remained lord of life and death and continued to hope in vain that one day the emperor might end his humiliation by granting him the title of king.
At the same time, following the upheaval that accompanied the tax registration or census ordered in 6 CF. Such was the general ambience in which the personality and character of Jesus the Jew were formed.
We know nothing concrete, however, about his education and training, his contacts, or the influences to which he may have been subjected; for, quite apart from the unhistorical nature of the stories relating to his infancy and childhood, the interval between his twelfth year and the start of his public ministry is wrapped in total silence by the four evangelists. Jesus spent not only his early years, but also the greatest part of his public life in Galilee. If we adopt the chronology of the Synoptic Gospels Matthew, Mark and Luke with their one-year ministry, apart from brief excursions to Phoenicia now Lebanon and Perea or present day north- ern Transjordan , he left his province only once - for the fateful journey to Jerusalem at Passover.
But even if the longer time-table of John's Fourth Gospel is followed, the Judaean stays ofJesus corresponded to the manda- tory pilgrimages to the Temple, and as such were of short duration. Therefore, if we are to understand him, it is into the Galilean world that we must look. The Galilee ofJes us, especially his own part of it, Lower Galilee around the Lake of Gennesaret, was a rich and mostly agricultural country.
The inhabitants were proud of their independence and jealous of their Jewish- ness, in which regard, despite doubts often expressed by Judaeans, they considered themselves second to none. They were also brave and tough. Josephus, the commander-in-chief of the region during the first Jewish War, praises their courage, and describes them as people 'from infancy inured to war' BJ iii In effect, in the mountains of Upper Galilee, rebellion against the government - any government, Hasmonean, Herodian, Roman - was endemic between the middle of the first century BCE and 70 CE, from Ezekias, the archilestes the chief brigand or revolutionary whose uprising was put down by the young Herod, through the arch-Zealot Judas the Galilean and his rebellious sons, to John the son of Levi from Gush Halav and his 'Galilean contingent', notorious in besieged Jerusalem for their 'mischievous ingenuity and audacity' BJ iv.
In short, the Galileans were admired as staunch fighters by those who sympathized with their rebellious aims; those who did not, thought of them as dangerous hot-heads. In Jerusalem, and in Judaean circles, they had also the reputation of being an unsophisticated people. He is presented as a typical 'peasant', a boor, a 'am ha-are:?
Cut otf from the Temple and the study centres of Jerusalem, Galilean popular religion appears to have depended - until the arrival at Usha, in the late 13os CE, of the rabbinic academy expelled from Yavneh - not so much on the authority of the priests or on the scholarship of scribes, as on the magnetism of their local saints like Jesus' younger contemporary, Hanina hen Dosa, the celebrated miracle-worker.
Instead, I will rely on those simple ;1ccounts of the first three Gospels which suggest that Jesus impressed his countrymen, and acquired fame among them, chiefly as a charismatic teacher, healer and exorcist. I should specify at once, however, that my purpose is not to discuss his teachings. Few, in any case, will contest that his message was essentially Jewish, or that on certain controversial issues, for example whether the dead would rise again, he voiced the opinion of the Pharisees.
His renown, the evangelists proclaim, had spread throughout Galilee. Wherever he went, to farmsteads, villages or towns, they laid out the sick in the market places and begged him to let them simply touch the edge of his cloak; and all who touched him were cured.
He healed many who suffered from various diseases, and drove out many deYils. Mark r. Luke Mark 2. We must, however, bear in mind, firstly that it is anachronistic and, in consequence, wrong to judge the first century by twentieth-century criteria, and secondly, that even in modern times, faith-healers and Wunderrebbe and their secular counterparts in the field of medicine, can and do obtain parallel therapeutic results where the individuals who ask for their help are animated by sufficient faith.
To assess correctly Jesus' healing and exorcistic activities, it is necessary to know that in bygone ages the Jews understood that a relationship existed between sickness, the devil and sin. As a logical counterpart to such a concept of ill-health, it was in consequence believed until as late as the third century BCE that recourse to the services of a physician demonstrated a lack of faith since healing was a monopoly of God.
The only inter- mediaries thought licit between God and the sick were men of God, such as the prophets Elijah and Elisha. By the beginning of the second pre- Christian century, however, the physician's office was made more or less respectable by the requirement that he, too, should be personally holy.
The Wisdom writer, Jesus bcn Sira, advised the devout when sick to pray, repent, and send gifts to the Temple, and subsequently to call in the physician, who would ask God for insight into the cause of the sickness and for the treatment needed to remedy it. As Ecclesiasticus words it: The Lord has imparted knowledge to men that by the use of His marvels He may win praise; by employing them, the doctor relieves pain.
In the episode of the crippled woman who was bent double and unable to hold herself upright, we read that He laid his hands on her, and at once she straightened up and began to praise God.
A deaf-mute was cured when Jesus placed his own saliva on the sufferer's tongue and ordered his ears to unblock, saying: Ephphatha 'eppatah : Be opened! Mark 7. Matthew's account of the episode reads: When CTesus had entered Capernaum a centurion came up to ask his help. Sir - he said - a boy of mine lies at home paralysed Jesus said, I will come and cure him. Sir, - replied the centurion - who am I to have you under my root? You need only say a word and the boy will be cured. I know, for I am myself under orders, with soldiers under me.
I say to one, Go! Jesus heard him with astonishment, and said to the people following him, I tell you this: nowhere, even in Israel, have I found such a faith. Then he said to the centurion, Go home now. Because of your faith, so let it be. At that moment the boy recovered. It will be seen from the second 'tory how closely the two tales coincide.
It happened that when Rabban Gamaliel's son fell ill, he sent two of his pupils to R. Hanina hen Dosa that he might pray for him. When he saw them, he went to the upper room and prayed. When he came down, he said to them, Go, for the fever has left him. They said to him, Are you a prophet? He said to them, I am no prophet, neither am I a prophet's son, but this is how I am blessed: if my prayer is fluent in my mouth, I know that the sick man is favoured; if not, I know that the disease is fatal.
They sat down, wrote and noted the hour. When they came to Rabban Gamaliel, he said to them, By heaven! You have neither detracted from it, nor added to it, but this is how it happened. It was at that hour that the fever left him and he asked us for water to drink. Therefore, by expelling and controlling these evil spirits, the exorcist was believed to be acting as God's agent in the work of liberation, healing and pardon.
Jesus was an exorcist, but not a professional one: he did not use incanta- tions such as those apparently composed by King Solomon, 5 or foul- smelling substances intolerable even to the most firmly ensconced of demons. He did not go in for producing smoke, as young Tobit did, by burning the heart and the liver of a fish Tobit 8.
This act is usually said to have been followed by relief, and at least a temporary remis- sion of the symptoms. Even in the Gospels, the demons seem to have had an uncanny facility for finding their way back to their former habitats Matt.
So - we read in Mark [Jesus and his disciples] came to the other side of the lake, into the coun- try of the Gerasenes. As he stepped ashore, a man possessed by an unclean spirit came up to him from among the tombs where he had his dwelling. He could no longer be controlled; even chains were useless; he had often been fettered and chained up, but he had snapped his chains and broken the fetters.
No one was strong enough to master him. And so, unceasingly, night and day, he would cry aloud among the tombs and on the hill-sides and cut himself with stones. When he saw Jesus in the distance, he ran and flung himself down before him, shouting loudly, In God's name, do not torment me! For Jesus was already saying to him, Out, unclean spirit, come out of this man!
The people Mark 5. Let no man go out alone at night Once she met R. Hanina hen Dosa and said to him, Had there been no commendation from heaven, 'Take heed of R. Hanina hen Dosa He said to her, Since I am so highly esteemed in heaven, I decree that you shall never again pass through an inhabited place.
But in this chain of cause and effect, linking, in the mind of the ancients, sickness to the devil, one more clement remains, namely sin. Besides heal- mg the flesh and exorcizing the mind, the holy man had one other task to perform: the forgiveness of sin. Here is the famous story of the paralytic hrought to Jesus in Capernaum. Four men were carrying him, but because of the crowd they could not i;ct him near.
So they opened up the roof over the place where Jesus was. When Jesus saw their faith, he said to the paralysed man, My son, your sins are forgiven. Why does the fellow talk like this? This is blasphemy! Who but God alone can forgive sins? Is it easier to say to this paralysed man, 'Your sins are forgiven', or to say, 'Stand up, take your hcd and walk'?
But to convince you that the son of man has right on earth to forgive sins - he turned to the paralysed man - I say to you, stand up, take your bed and go home! On the contrary, absolution from 1he guilt of wrong-doing appears to have been part and parcel of the charismatic style; this is well illustrated in an important Dead Sea Scrolls IO Jesus in his Jewish Context fragment, the Prayer ofNabonidus, which depicts a Jewish exorcist as hav- ing pardoned the Babylonian king's sins, thus curing him of his seven years' illness.
In the somewhat elastic, but extraordinarily perceptive reli- gious terminology of Jesus and the spiritual men of his age, 'to heal', 'to expel demons' and 'to forgive sins' were interchangeable synonyms. Indeed, the language and behaviour of Jesus is reminiscent of holy men of ages even earlier than his own, and it need cause little surprise to read in Matthew that he was known as 'the prophet Jesus from Nazareth in Galilee' Matt.
In fact, it could be advanced that, ifhe modelled himself on anyone at all, it was precisely on Elijah and Elisha, as the following argument with the people of his home-town Nazareth, would seem to bear out: Jesus said, No doubt you will quote the proverb to me, 'Physician, heal yourself!
There were many widows in Israel, you may be sure, in Elijah's time Again in the time of the prophet Elisha there were many lepers in Israel, and not one of them was healed, but only Naaman, the Syrian.